IBM has even created their own virtual tool. Parmar of IBM told CNN that he had to hold a meeting with technical leaders from various countries. Instead of everyone flying to some center location they used the Sametime 3D program to hold the meeting.
But these programs are not just for the office. VLES.com, according to David Itzkoff of The New York Times allows people to have a night out on the Lower East Side without getting up fromt he couch.
Sounds like a good time.
There are a lot of pros to these virtual sites. On the business side of things it is easier to conduct meetings. Companies spend a lot of money on travel, imagine cutting those expenses and just meeting in one of these worlds? Companies would save a lot of money and time. Also work does not have to stop because there is a blizzard.
Also there are some people out there who would do better in this virtual setting. They may feel more comfortable being more aggressive. These people may have some good ideas that they have been afraid to share.
As for the other aspects of virtual world, well like Sims it may be exciting to live different life for a while. Also think about if your friends are coming in from our of time and you need to find something to do. Well you can use a site like VLES. com to explore some places before you go.
Just like everything else, though, there are some negatives aspects. These virtual worlds are another example of how new media ruining communication skills. It is easier to express yourself online for some people but it is important to know how to do it in person. Especially in the business world. You learn how to be aggressive in a real meeting. You learn how if you want your ideas out there you need to speak up.
It is also much better if you explore the Lower East Side for real, rather than from your couch while you watch television.
VIrtual worlds should be used an addition not a substitute.
As for the future of virtual worlds, well I think some day soon our classrooms will look something like this...
It is only a matter of time.
I agree and believe that these advances in technology are coming at a cost. The more time people spend on their computers, phones, or video games, the less time they have to work on their face-to-face communication skills and physical relationships.
ReplyDeleteAs we continue to innovate our technology, we tend to rely on it more and more for communication and less face to face communication. I believe that face to face communication makes relationships more meaningful than via technology mediums.
ReplyDeleteOnce again, I like how you included images in your blog post.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI agree that we now live in a digital age. "Up In The Air" put it best when the movie stated that there is a level of dignity that can only be done from face to face interaction. As a journaiist/PA person myself, I actually write to express the subject's concern by writing his/her emotions during the interview. I feel that people still look for that. Even in the digital age. I don't think anyone would stand for Oprah to have all of her interviews done via SKYPE. Though that's my opinion. Love the blog, and you can expect me as a devoted follower.
ReplyDelete